Hosted Sites
Associated Sites
Latest Comments
Latest MG Tweets
Polls
Our Sponsors
Newsflash
Welcome to the latest iteration of MediaGauntlet! We've redesigned everything for a smoother look and better functionality. If you can call it that. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >> |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Page 1 of 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



There was no way that a good movie could be made from the Street Fighter franchise. The very concept of a Street Fighter movie stands in antithesis of the games. How does one make a film from a concept that features nothing more than two people with irrelevant motives punching each other into unconsciousness in a no-hold-barred fighting competition? The canvas is bare, obviously, and you can fill those gaps with any manner of things, but why? And won't the details that surround the concept ultimately corrupt and overpower the idea of people duking it out in some street competition for some ultimate prize?
HBO's "Hung" is the latest in their attempts to recapture the glory of past years' pay cable ratings bonanzas.
Perhaps I'm getting too used to the stylings of Mr. Boll. Maybe he's growing on me. Maybe I'm tired and don't know what I'm saying. But, after Bloodrayne II actually had a bit of style to it and Dungeon Siege was enjoyable in a simple fantasy way, I think Boll is setting a trend of making watchable, if not good, movies. Postal is another example of this.
















